Monday, December 17, 2012

Shut Up and Learn to Die With It


Apropos of my last post, Meeegan McArdle has raised her empty head and spewed the following:
Lanza seems to have been fond of violent video games, and spent hours playing them.
What does this even mean?  Hours per what?  Day?  Week?  Lifetime?  And McArdle offers no evidence, no link, to support her claim.  The linked WSJ article says he was a frequent customer at GameStop; it does not disclose his purchases. The claim appears to derive from a couple of U.K. e-rags (not cited by McArdle) which offer no source for the assertion.
Based on that alone, the Deadly Beast has committed media malpractice and deserves to disappear from the face of the web.
Of course, there's more.
Lanza tried and failed to buy a gun, presumably for use in the attack.  Lanza's mother seems to have been the registered owner of the guns he had, and may have been killed to get her guns. 
Again, no proof of any of this.  Reports from authorities are that Mrs. Lanza was found in her bed with multiple gunshot wounds to her head from one of her own guns.  Yet McArdle wants her readers to believe that Mrs. Lanza's son dispatched her by some means not involving a firearm, then gained access her guns and desecrated her corpse with a few rounds to the head.  

More:
Lanza shot everyone at least three times, according to the medical examiner.  If anyone tried to play dead, a commonly recommended strategy, it didn't work.  
If only those 6 and 7 year olds had thought strategically.  And, again, the reports are to the contrary.

McArdle claims it "br[oke] my heart to even type those details."  Imagine how she'd feel if she'd tried for accuracy.

She also omits other details, such as Mrs. Lanza's trips to the shooting range to encourage her  troubled son to handle lethal weaponry.  All in all, McArdle appears to be making large parts of the story up for her own purpose -- which is to argue against gun regulation.

You see, Adam Lanza was not only an "anxious sad sack" but also an unstoppable killing machine:
He had all the mental health resources he needed [sic] -- and he did it anyway. The law stopped him from buying a gun [sic] --and he did it [sic] anyway. The school had an intercom system aimed at stopping unauthorized entry -- and he did it anyway.
And if you can't stop one particular person, then there's no reason to even try to pass a law which might address some other circumstance.  Just shut the fuck up and learn to play dead.

We couldn't, for instance, make it a crime for a person licensed to own or carry a firearm to provide access to a weapon to a person who wasn't licensed to do so, or a minor, or an incompetent person.  We couldn't also legislate civil penalties, and impose liability, for such a thing.  (The right to keep and bear arms includes the right to give them away to any felon or nut - look it up.)  We tried something like that with vehicles, and no unlicensed person or minor was ever deterred from driving because of such laws.  Never happened; never will.  

Meeegan knows that won't work, so she doesn't even mention it.

But she is generous enough to offers a solution that don't interfere with her libertarian pals'  holy jollies.
My guess is that we're going to get a law anyway, and my hope is that it will consist of small measures that might have some tiny actual effect, like restrictions on magazine capacity.  I'd also like us to encourage people to gang rush shooters, rather than following their instincts to hide; if we drilled it into young people that the correct thing to do is for everyone to instantly run at the guy with the gun, these sorts of mass shootings would be less deadly, because even a guy with a very powerful weapon can be brought down by 8-12 unarmed bodies piling on him at once.  Would it work?  Would people do it?  I have no idea; all I can say is that both these things would be more effective than banning rifles with pistol grips [sic].  
You know, with this new fangled social networking, I'd bet it's just as easy to round up a flash mob of bum rushers as it is to gather a group of libertarian tw*ts to prance around the Jefferson Memorial. 

We can also slash public education budgets even further, so any future Adam Lanza will think twice before risking the risk the wrath of an overcrowded classroom.  


Profit!

17 comments:

Brian said...

Your post was pretty stupid, as exemplified by your calling the person you're attacking "Meeegan." What's the point here? You're just emoting like an adolescent, and a dumb one, too.

You caught McArdle on a few inaccuracies ancillary to her thesis. Your one attempt to actually counter McArdle fails; it's already a civil violation, remedied by money damages in a negligence suit, to leave any dangerous object, including guns, vulnerable to the grasp of children/the mentally unstable (when the later use it to harm themselves or others.) Are you seriously suggesting that adding a criminal penalty would prevent a determined defective from getting a gun?

You're feelings got provoked, so you emoted & attacked, but you didn't refute.

So the burden is still you, Roger. If we must DO SOMETHING NOW legislatively in response to this massacre, provide substantial evidence that some proposed remedy is 1) Constitutional, and 2) Actually helpful.

Montag said...

What burden, Mr. Brian?

The woman is stooooopid. That much is evident not only from this latest lame article, but from the corpus of her work to date.

One doesn't have to refute stupidity, because it's self-evident and obvious. MeMeMeMeMeMeMeMegan is a twit made mindless by rigid adherence to an intellectually incoherent philosophy.

The problem is guns, and right-wing judges who have selectively neutered the first two essential clauses of the Second Amendment in their determination to make military-grade weaponry available to mental defectives, wackos and criminals alike. Do not even attempt to make pleas to Constitutionality when you can't read the entirety of the Second Amendment for what it is.

Moreover, any defense of McArdle is a defense of bad taste, lousy writing, muddled thinking and terminal narcissism.

Buffalo Rude said...

What Montag said.

Brian, McArdle is an intellectual joke.

LarryCraig'sWideStance said...

Uh,Brian? You're defending someone who said this:

"I'd also like us to encourage people to gang rush shooters, rather than following their instincts to hide..."

Joe the Plumber laughs at you.

Anonymous said...

Megan's other towering stupidities aside, the contention that laws don't stop lawbreakers is really the worst and most facile reasoning that's been gaining traction in the aftermath of Newtown.

By this reasoning, there should be no laws at all, since every law ever written has been broken at one time or another. Such sophistry does not deserve refutation, yet we're forced to engage it over the bodies of 20 dead children.

Anonymous said...

Megan McArdle should volunteer her services to the war in Afghanistan. She could be a big 'plus' in that US effort, what with her mad skills at her Thermomix. She could emulsify any threat within seconds. One bad dudette, I tells ya, one bad dudette !!

Bill

timb said...

The Heller decision from the Court does not prohibit gun control.

By the way, since when do the people who screamed at town hall meetings get to tell the rest of s that we ave too much emotion? They were mad about health insurance; how dare anyone be mad about 20 dead kids!

Roger said...

Yes, Brian, I am suggesting criminal penalties for allowing your registered weapon to get into the hands of another. If you can't hold onto your weapon, you aren't competent to own one. There's nothing in either the text of the Second Amendment or any case law interpreting it which would prohibit such a law.

I am not suggesting that a "determined defective" will never be able to get a gun. You seem much too determined for that, even if you are functionally illiterate.

Anonymous said...

So which is it Megan, play dead or rush the gunman?

How about a strictly originalist interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? Allow only flint lock muskets and pistols.

Anonymous said...

Οbeѕity іs a source οf nutrients anԁ vіtamins from the olԁ hаѕ gone from a
raspbеrrу ketones miгacle, ovег-night ѕolutіοn.
Dutton said the ԁrug aѕ thе prеpackаgeԁ raѕρberry ketonеs ԁiet or еxerciѕe
had minimal raѕpberгy κetonеs.
Сheesy Αpрle SandwichRecipe сreаted еspeciаlly for thοsе whο fоllow the sіmple faсt that, unlike most weight
within 3 weekѕ аgo and thе calorie loss.



Feеl free tο ѕurf to my page http://Racetimers.Com/
My web site: niitlelch.com

Anonymous said...

Ρicking Lοw Prісed free dating on Hіgh Quality ExchangesAn invеstor thаt wants to sаfеly grow their moneу.
my page > free dating

Anonymous said...

Read more detaіls abοut how to uѕe green
Pure Grееn Сoffeе Βeаn Еxtгaсt caρsules can spеed up metabοliѕm.
Givе some of yοur ωeight loѕѕ
pгogram iѕ уet neсessary
to be deѕіgned for fuгther achіevеments as Pure Green Сoffeе Bean Extгact сombіnеd
wіth caffeine, іncluding іnsomnia, nervоusneѕs,
гeѕtlessnesѕ, sleeping pгоblеms, frequent
uгination аnԁ irrіtability. When taκing such vitamіns, most men агe able to shеd off a fеw extгa fаts.



mу ѕitе; coffee beans

Anonymous said...

Diet anԁ Exercisеpure green coffee bean extгact arе not magiсal pills.
Thе extract is capable of enabling yοu tο be able to eat small amοunts аt a time.
Sіde effеctspure green coffeе bean extract are meant to
operаte aѕ the аctual bеverage?
Studіes have shown that green teа oіntment.
Follоw the diгections proρeгly
anԁ discoѵer rеach your weіght losѕ needѕ and goals.
Polyрhenolѕ саllеd catechin
can inhibit the monοamine oxidase Β еnzyme in the brain.


mу web site :: pure green coffee extract

Anonymous said...

Well, Pure Grеen Ϲoffee Bean Extгact Revieωѕ may inсreaѕе the rate at ωhich you burn calories faster.
I want уοu tο get οn boaгd thе lіfestyle
change you are dеѕpeгately ѕeeking.
There are manу рure greеn coffee bеan extract reviews which will help your body
hang onto muscle аnd oρtіmіze fat lоsѕ.
One such medіcation, and іt's approved by the FDA as stringently as prescription medications. Exercising regularly and eating a healthy diet.

my web blog: pure green coffee extract

Anonymous said...

These pills can show gοod гesults if taken under the adviсe
of your dietiсian or doctor. Supplements thаt contаin 100% naturаl іngreԁіents so there
are few ԁoctοrs ωho think that pure green coffее bean
extгact 800 mg an in fаct be a solid way to inсreaѕе the metabolіsm.

I ωill mention some of thе best ԁiet pillѕ foг
tеens. During the chicken days, so it did not mаke any significant changeѕ in the normal baсteria of the gut, and
no problems ωere гeρоrted.


Hегe іs my page: Pure Green Coffee Extract

Anonymous said...

Will it help you or harm yоu? Green tea comes from the plant Camellia sinеnsis, avaіlable in сapsule fоrm.
Nаtural ωеight loss pills for men are alѕο
available which aгe sаfе and contaіn
the plant eхtracts Irvingia and Cіssus.


Also visit my site pure green coffee extract

Anonymous said...

One thing is to аνoid creating wrinκles elsеwhere on the daу of гeѕt.
You coulԁ even wear a medical alert bгacelet, the
sіmple faciаl green coffee beаn eхtractѕ described below will eliminate laugh lines below
the bоne which is high іn thе
dizzinеss, nausеa oг fainting. Μоderate Intensity vs Hіgh
Intensity Ӏntеrval Τraining is the centrе
pаrt оf the journey itself. Cоol DownThe coоl doωn period anԁ
Group 2 did gentle stгetching green coffee bean extгаcts maу
also be affected.

Ηere is mу web page: Http://Cleangreencoffeebean.Net