| Roger Ailes RIP IT ALL TO SHREDS AND LET IT GO |
|
Friday, February 09, 2007 Why We'll Never Have A President Named Jack, Bill, Dick, Jerry, Jimmy or AbeThe rest home for aging male Beltway dead-enders known as "The Politico" is taking the G.O.P.'s anti-Obama talking points out for a test drive, and putting them in the mouths of nameless "Democratic" blowhards: Even his name offers fodder for the critics. When he was growing up, his family, friends and teachers called him "Barry." Then as a young man, he started insisting on "Barack," explaining in a memoir published in 1995 that his grandfather was a Muslim and that it means "blessed" in Arabic. His dad, who was Kenyan, had gone by "Barry" -- probably trying to fit in when he came to the States, his son figured. What's in a name? A way for Mike Allen to pad a particularly pathetic -- and phony -- tale of Democratic infighting and dirty tricks. Somehow Abe Lincoln and Dick Nixon managed to overcome the earth-shattering relevation that their family and friends had nicknames for them, but they nevertheless chose to use their given name in professional matters. Apart from such stupidity, the entire piece is a fraud. The title promises to take the reader "Inside the Coming Effort to Dismantle A Candidate," but the article doesn't even try to do that. The piece quotes nameless "top Democrat[s]," "Democratic strategists" and jes' plain ol' "Democrats"1 who aren't sure Obama can go the distance, and it maps out Obama's perceived weaknesses (with no new revelations). Yet the piece contains not one word about an actual effort or plan by an actual Dem rival to attack Obama on the grounds outlined in the piece. In other words, not one inside detail. Perhaps any or all of the Democratic candidates have $12 million budgeted for a series of Barry-centric attack ads2, but, if they do, you won't learn about that -- or any other actual Dem's strategy in Allen's piece. More significantly, the piece contains not one word about the real and ongoing campaign by the G.O.P. media to portray Obama as an anti-American, radical Muslim indoctrinated at a madrassa and a phony Christian. The effort isn't coming; it has already started. Only Allen pretends not to notice. Update: Feck! Via Atrios, I see someone has stolen my patented and wholly original idea of making fun of hacks. And backing up their ridicule with linguistic research, just to make me look lazy. These Berkeley profs. will make my life miserable until the day I die. posted by Roger | | 11:23 PMHowie Kurtz, G.O.P. BitchWriting about the fraudulent Pelosi air travel story, fraudulent journalist Howard Kurtz spins for his masters: Here's some typical blog reaction. Radiant Times: How typical is this "blog reaction?" That's why you can't spell Howie without [colloquial abbreviation for a prostitute]. posted by Roger | | 6:57 AMThursday, February 08, 2007 Spread Too ThinI worry that our cable networks lack sufficient resources to cover both the death of Anna Nicole Smith and the diaper-wearing astronaut story at the same time. posted by Roger | | 5:17 PMJean JeaneJames Wolcott catches the Depends crew mangling Ambassador Kirkpatrick's name in an ostensible tribute to the stone cold warrior. It's not the first time and, barring the end of wingnut welfare as we know it, it won't be the last. posted by Roger | | 12:10 PMThe value of torture.The spiritual forbears of Abu Gonzales and John Yoo show us how it's done. posted by Roger | | 6:04 AMWednesday, February 07, 2007 Tom Hilton says it all. If you can't stand the speech, get the fuck out of the blogosphere. posted by Roger | | 7:42 PM Tuesday, February 06, 2007 Dear Ms. Kakutani, Yes, Dinesh D'Souza is a dishonest, shrill little troll. However, the title of the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing is "Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside The U.S." Don't give Bush a pass he doesn't deserve. posted by Roger | | 4:32 PM Tri-Corner HacksI've got to admit that the almost-never right Sully Joe got this one right: Mickey Kaus accuses Joe Klein of having it both ways on the Iraq war. I'd say that's better than having no coherent position on the war at all, except fathomless bitchiness toward anyone who ever had the balls to take a stand. But that's Mickey - circling the drain of his own irrelevance. And bitchily attacking anyone who's trying honestly to do better.Except that's not a drain, and we don't call it "circling" here in the United States. And Klein's as worthless as Kaus, except in writing skills. But those are minor quibbles. The latest ploy from the hairless hack (Kaus, not Sullivan, or Klein) was to wonder who would suffer politically if the surge succeeded. Kaus's fantasy was that Dems (and Chuck Hagel, who took Kaus's spot in Vietnam) would suffer. Of course, no concern was expressed for those who have suffered pre-surge or those who would suffer because of the surge. posted by Roger | | 4:12 PMMonday, February 05, 2007 Here are the answers to the 2006 Roger Ailes Year-In-Review Quiz: Part I -- Grand Old Police Blotter: The Year In Republicrime a. Bob Ney -- 6. Conspiracy, making false statementsposted by Roger | | 9:43 PM Part II -- Who Said It? 1. "Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know - fiction!" Steven Colbertposted by Roger | | 9:42 PM Part III -- Multiple Guess 1. Which one of the following moronic statements by a blogger is fake:posted by Roger | | 9:41 PM Part IV -- Dr. Phil In The Blank 1. "I'm the decider, and I decide what is best. And what's best is for Don Rumsfeld to remain as the secretary of defense."posted by Roger | | 9:40 PM Part V -- WTF? 1. Dubai Ports Worldposted by Roger | | 9:39 PM Sunday, February 04, 2007 Programming NotesHaving spent the last twenty minutes trying to sign into Blogger (a common occurrence with the "new" Blogger), please note: 1. The answers to the Year-In-Review Quiz will be posted tomorrow; and 2. Yes, Tom DeLay was House Majority Leader. I'm a moron. Oh, and: Blogger sucks. Labels: Blogger sucks posted by Roger | | 7:06 PMRoger's Super Bowl PredictionI confidently predict that I won't be watching the Super Bowl this year. I haven't seen an entire Super Bowl since XX, when Mike Singletary and Sweetness led the Chicago Bears in 46-10 rout of the New England Pats. My interest that year was primarily in someone else who was attending the same viewing party, and only Tony Eason's 0 for 6 completions kept me from being the biggest loser of January 26, 1986. I don't even know which network it's on this year. So I'll probably spend the time writing scathing letters to my HMO or (finally) posting the results of the 2006 Year-in-Review Quiz. posted by Roger | | 10:26 AMNot In This Dick's ArmeyHow low has Tom DeLay, the tiny toxic Texan, sunk? Well, now even Dick Armey thinks he's a scumbag: I have my own understandings and feelings about Tom DeLay. ... I don't believe he's a good person, and I don't believe he ... should have been in public office. Thanks a wad, Dick, for letting us know before DeLay became Speaker of the House. (Link via Talking Points Memo.) posted by Roger | | 10:21 AM |
|
||||
|
|
|||||