| Roger Ailes Quitters Never Win |
|
Saturday, April 14, 2007 Another Wingnut For InternmentJohann Hari on psuedo-toff tosser Andrew Roberts: Much of Roberts's advice to Bush is based on similarly skewed and surreal misreadings of history. For example, he has advised Bush to adopt "the whole idea of mass internment," saying: "I think it is the way the administration of Iraq should go." At his lunch with Bush, according to economist Irwin Stelzer, who was present, Roberts cited Ireland as a place where internment worked. America, The World's Jailer. It's so crazy it just might work. Exactly like it did the last the time we tried it in Iraq. posted by Roger | | 11:17 PMRoger Recommends Le siege de Paris, by Jean-Louis-Ernest Meissonier For those who want to appear well read without the hassle of reading or those who can't stomach the vast wasteland that is broadcast radio, I'm happy to let you in a solution that's quite bearable: audiobooks. The Replacement KillersChuck Schumer will probably get a bit more love in the leftwingosphere in the near future: "Please treat this as confidential," Mr. Sampson wrote in the [January 9, 2006 e-mail] message. He concluded, "If a decision is made to remove and replace a limited number of U.S. attorneys, then the following might be considered for removal and possible replacement." That's Libby-style perjury, that is. And Sampson handed it to Senator Schumer on a silver platter. posted by Roger | | 7:31 AMA Noonan FlashbackI missed the fourth anniversary of this Peggy Noonan Classic: Weeks later, after all the news--the invasion, Saddam gone, more al Qaeda arrests--the president of the United States had a meeting that he'd been looking forward to. It was in the Oval Office. It was early evening and the lamps seemed to light it with a golden glow. The door opened, and in marched the men who got Osama. The Ranger crew, the Screaming Eagles who guarded them. Bin Laden may live on, but Karl Rove's e-mails will never terrorize another American ever again, that's for damn sure. Wednesday, April 11, 2007 Howie The Empty-Headed HoHowie Kurtz, forced to address the ravings of his racist pal, provides the KKK man with a defense. In a column insanely titled "The Race Debate" (What, exactly, is being debated - whether the Rutgers team really are hos?), Kurtz writes: Journalists like me who have gone on Imus's show have done so because we enjoyed the opportunity to talk about politics and media without the stuffiness of so many other programs. And it's probably true that too many of us looked the other way when he went over the line with some of his cruder comedy bits. He's now vowing to clean up his act, and I hope he does. Here's a hint, Howie. If you enjoy talking about politics and media without the stuffiness of many teevee programs, talk about those topics with like-minded friends off the teevee. You still exist if no one's there to film you. Or get yourself invited on the hundreds of teevee and radio programs that don't star a racist clown. (Yes, that means stay away from O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Savage and the Salem Radio Network.) The reason you "looked the other way," Ho, is that Imus's bigotry never bothered you. In fact, 11 years ago, you wrote that "Imus's sexist, homophobic and politically incorrect routines echo what many journalists joke about in private." Unstuffy journalists like you, Howie? Never mind what Imus said, sez Kurtz. Black people invented the word "ho," Jesse Jackson impregnated someone other than his wife, and Al Sharpton supported Tawana Brawley. In other words, they started it. Thanks for showing us your colors, Howie. posted by Roger | | 9:40 PMMonday, April 09, 2007 Conflict-of-Interest Kurtz Rides AgainHoward Kurtz can't be bothered with the Don Imus story. It's not in his column today, or his online "Extra" column. And it wasn't on his CNN media program, The Jonah Goldberg Show, this weekend. And somehow no one managed to mention Imus during Kurtz's weekly chat, in which Kurtz controls the questioning. |
|
||||
|
|
|||||