Sunday, February 08, 2015

The Andrew Sullivan Decade and a Half, Part 2: Bush Lied, Sully Complied

Vile Sully, September 30, 2002:
So at a crucial juncture in American diplomacy, this Democrat [Congressman Jim McDerrmott] is saying that Bush is a liar and a cheat – and in Baghdad! The only word for this is vile.
Vile Sully's post is entitled "Whose Side They Are On." 

The truth:  Bush lied

Update 2/9:  Corrected date from 2012 to 2002. But technically I was right, because 9/11 changed everything.

6 comments:

Susan of Texas said...

What a treasure trove of hysterical bloodthirst.

SONTAG AWARD NOMINEE: "Soviet-style communism failed, not because it was intrinsically evil but because it was flawed. It allowed too few people to usurp too much power: 21st-century market-capitalism, American-style, will fail for the same reasons." - Arundhati Roy in the Guardian.

And

THANKS: Last week was our best ever: 230,000 unique visits in seven days.

9/11 was the greatest thing that ever happened to this miserable little people.

Anonymous said...

September 30, 2002

Thomas said...

Yes, big difference between 2012 and 2002. It was 2002.

lea-p said...

ahhh, you need to read Driftglass, A Tale of Two Bloggers for the real unblemished honesty about Sullivan's character. What a vile human he is.

Rand Careaga said...

I may have left the impression in an earlier comment thread that I'm a Sullivan partisan. I'm not. But I visited his blog at least once a day, and appreciated many of his aggregations. Certainly should a Nuremberg trial ever be held for complicity in XXI century US warmongering, then Sully gets a minimum seven-year lease on a cell in Den Haag.

This said, he at least publicly recanted, albeit entirely to his advantage. Nevertheless, that's why my ideal tribunal gives him just seven years as against William Kristol's death sentence, commuted to life imprisonment on the grounds of documented stupidity.

He was a drama queen, and his several sins dating back twenty years and going right up to his dead-ender defense of "The Bell Curve" are duly noted, but among the rightbloggers in living memory he strikes me as a comparatively benign character.

Roger said...

He recanted in an e-book entitled "I Was Wrong," which consisted of a collection of his posts, selected by two of his assistants, and a 1 and 1/2 page (more or less) intro and outro. It was published as an e-book with this note:

"If you haven’t yet subscribed but want to read the eBook – the kind of journalistic accountability for error Paul Krugman called for today – or listen to the podcast (perhaps the most intense and humbling public conversation I have ever had), you can get immediate access to Deep Dish and unlimited access to the Dish by subscribing here. If you’ve been hemming and hawing, this is an opportunity not just to help us, but to help others pioneer a new business model for long-form quality magazine journalism. Subscribe here. It takes two minutes and it’s just $1.99 a month or $19.99 a year. Or more, if you really want to help us turn this prototype into a more sustainable reality."

Some gave all.