| Roger Ailes The War On Christmas Begins Here |
|
Monday, September 06, 2010 Will Jindal Endorse Vitter? Depends.Jindal flip-flops on his support for prostitute enthusiast David Vitter: UPDATE: Melissa Sellers, a spokeswoman for Jindal, tells CNN the governor meant to convey he has not weighed in on the race yet, but may do so in the future. Ms. Sellers' explanation doesn't hold water. If Piyush had meant to say that he hadn't endorsed anyone yet, he would have said that. Don't piss on my leg and tell me that it's Senator Vitter, Bobby. posted by Roger | | 10:14 AMSunday, September 05, 2010 An Entire Career, SummarizedWonderful as it would be if Ms. McArdle's opinion of our book were to change when/if she gets around to actually reading it, I'm not holding my breath because I don't think she's responding to the substance of the book at all; she's responding to what it makes her feel, which is something entirely different. Yes. It's a paycheck. Update: Ann Alchouse throws her morning wood onto Meeegan's bonfire of the inanities. (Via Fire Meeegan via Sadly, Bonobo!) posted by Roger | | 11:52 AMThursday, September 02, 2010 How sleazy is Politico's Ben Smith? Watch this: A former aide to the McCain campaign got in touch with me this morning to cop to being the half-serious progenitor of a story which, embellished almost beyond recognition, appears in Vanity Fair's portrait today of Sarah Palin as monster. Smith assumes that Vanity Fair's version is a mistelling -- an embellishment -- of the Times story. (Weigel makes the same bonehead mistake.) But the Vanity Fair story recounts a discussion in which Palin speaks to McCain aides, and the Times article quotes an "insider" speculating to the press, off the record. Smith offers no evidence that Vanity Fair account came from his anonymous source, or that the two articles were referring to the same event. There's no reason both things couldn't have happened -- Sharia making her statement to McCain campaign staffers while an entirely different staffer (or the same staffer who didn't want to attribute the source of his or her idea) blabbed his or her insipid thoughts to the Times. It's not only possible, it's plausible. I don't care whether either story is true. The significance of the matter is that it demonstrates that Smith is a Palin fluffer who's willing to make unwarranted assumptions and slime other reporters in support of a fellow right-wing Republican. As far as can be determined from Smith's article, Smith didn't contact Vanity Fair to determine its source(s); he didn't contact Palin; he didn't even confirm that his source was also the Vanity Fair source. He just assumed his ass off. Smith strapped on the half-term Gubernatorial knee-pads and phonied up a bullshit defense. At Politicho, that's par for the course. posted by Roger | | 10:16 PMAs Seen On A Milk Carton Could someone in the Los Angeles area please check up on Mickey Kaus? We don't want another Yolanda Schlessinger scenario. Update: The midget hack has been spotted on Twitter. So he's only Yolanda Schlessinger from the neck down. posted by Roger | | 1:18 PMThe fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth finds a natural outlet for his abilities. And the home of a lot of challengers for his title. posted by Roger | | 10:41 AM |
|
||||
|
|
|||||