Transsexual, White Lyndon Johnson
|
|
| Roger Ailes Transsexual, White Lyndon Johnson |
|
|
Friday, August 13, 2010 Campbell's Thick and ChunkyRoss Douchehat says: The interplay of fertility, reproductive impulses and gender differences in heterosexual relationships is, for want of a better word, “thick.” Heterosexual relationships are like Chunky Reese Witherspoon's ass. So thick you can eat them with a fork. The "better" word that Douchehat wants to use is phallocentric -- as in this marriage is only big enough for one cock, and I'm the Dick. But, really, who gives a fuck what Douchehat thinks? His wife surely didn't buy Ross's definition of thick -- given all the evidence to the contrary -- and neither will anyone else. My beef here is with Ezra Klein's characterization of Douchehat: And Ross Douthat, as humane and thoughtful a supporter of traditional marriage as you'll find.... If, by humble and thoughtful, you mean pompous and illogical.... The idea that Douthat's opposition to marriage equality is "support of traditional marriage" is laughable. The point is so obvious that it hardly needs repeating -- thoughtful supporters of heterosexual marriage can, and by definition do, support the rights of gay men and lesbians. I'm agnostic on marriage, but I'm a holy roller on discrimination. P.S. Yes, World-O-Crap was there first. posted by Roger | | 8:22 AMTuesday, August 10, 2010 Zero At The BoneheadMeegan McArdle does battle with the strawpersons inside her otherwise vacant skull: I am hoping that at least one person will attempt to explain why we should support the mosque near Ground Zero, but not the gay bar next to the mosque near Ground Zero. This from someone who desecrates "Ground Zero" by putting it on her resume. Sorry, Meegan, but no one wants to play in your delusional hollow head. posted by Roger | | 8:50 AMMonday, August 09, 2010 Marty Peretz is right. The Ground Zero mosque controversy is not about freedom of religion. Peretz is not arguing that Muslims should not be allowed to build a mosque in New York City, only that they not be allowed to build a mosque in locations where the structure might cause anger or grief to Christians or Jews. Certainly that is not too much to ask. Peretz recognizes the need to protect Muslims from the “dark places” of distraught Christians and Jews. Ideally, Muslims could live in special areas of our cities where they could freely assemble and worship together, thus avoiding any First Amendment concerns. These places could be identified by high ceremonial walls, with towering wide gates symbolizing the openness of Western culture. Of course, Muslims would remain free to visit any parts of the city they choose, within reason. And to avoid misunderstanding and conflict, the Muslims can keep the Christians and Jews locked out of their enclaves during Ramadan, and themselves safely locked inside during Christmas and Passover. What do you have against compromise? posted by Roger | | 4:39 PM Mickey Kaus, blogger without visible means of support, comments on the Obama marriage and Democratic Party campaign tactics. If anyone's qualified to give advice about successful marriages and political campaigns, that person is more qualified than Kaus. posted by Roger | | 3:50 PM Sunday, August 08, 2010 Kausfiles Buries The LedeFrom M.K. Ultrahack's Twitter feed: @NickBaumann I hope to get paid soon, but right now I'm between sites. Nobody's paying what they used to pay, that's for sure. Cheers We wish Mr. Kaus all the best. Maybe a nice union job. Or he could show those overpaid, pampered public school teachers how it's done. A bidding war between The Atlantic and Human Events. Andrew Breitbart's Big Forehead. Roger L. Simon's care attendant. A fence. I'm just spitballing here.... posted by Roger | | 9:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
||||
|
|||||