Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Monday, January 30, 2012
The Voters Speak
From the Trump-affiliated website, "Should Trump Run," Donald Trump has everyone talking about the most important issues of the day:RECENT COMMENTSWhile the economy is obviously uppermost in voters' minds, the electorate is split on questions of health care.
Should Donald Run
1 hour 21 min ago
viagra cheap
1 hour 36 min ago
cheap cialis
1 hour 36 min ago
viagra cheap online
1 hour 36 min ago
cialis cheap
1 hour 36 min ago
Hello! ,
1 hour 36 min ago
cheap viagra
2 hours 53 min ago
viagra cheap
3 hours 16 min ago
viagra cheap online
3 hours 40 min ago
viagra cheap
4 hours 4 min ago
It's no wonder the EMESSEM is taking the Trump candidacy seriously, and with appropriate deference.
Update (2/2): In recent comments, Trump-backers have voiced a preference for a particular boner pill. Expect an endorsement from Trump any second now.
cialis cheap
2 min 21 sec ago
online cialis cheap
48 min 20 sec ago
cialis
1 hour 10 min ago
viagra 100mg
1 hour 33 min ago
cialis cheap online
1 hour 57 min ago
cialis 20mg online
2 hours 20 min ago
cialis 20mg online
2 hours 45 min ago
cheap viagra
3 hours 10 min ago
cialis cheap online
3 hours 35 min ago
viagra 100mg
4 hours 1 min ago
Sunday, January 29, 2012
As Spermin' Cain and Sharia Plain jockey for the job as Newton Leroi's running mate, one has to ask if John McCain is the Lavrentiy Beria of the Romney Commissariat for Internal Affairs (Rom-Com).
Saturday, January 28, 2012
The Telling Detail
Ron Paul's former employee says Paul knew exactly what was in his racist newsleters. The head of the Cato Institute says Paul used the mailing lists of anti-semitic organizations to find subscribers. Paul continues to deny the truth. Here's how you can tell who to believe:
It is unclear precisely how much money Paul made from his newsletters, but during the years he was publishing them, he reduced his debts and substantially increased his net worth, according to his congressional and presidential disclosure reports.
In 1984, he reported debt of up to $765,000, most of which was gone by 1995, when he reported a net worth of up to $3.3 million. Last year, he reported a net worth of up to $5.2 million.
The libertarian philosophy in action: anything that makes you rich is good.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Breaking: Politico Blows Matt Drudge
Drudgeico and its chief Drudgesuckers, Mike Allen and Jim Vanderheidiho, are brainlessly reporting that Eggs Drudge is linking to anti-Newton pieces. At the Memeorandum link and the Drudgeico homepage, the story is titled "The Right Drops a Bomb on Newt." The actual story is titled "Drudge, conservative media criticize Newt Gingrich," apparently due the substantial differences between whiny bitching and dropping a bomb.
So who are the conservative worthies bashing Newton? Criminals Tom Delay and Elliot Abrams (who undoubtedly would drop a bomb on Newton if he could), circus freaks R. Emmett Tyrell and Ann Coulter, and a "top conservative media figure" who "spoke on condition of anonymity to protect private conversations" and who is also an "official" of some sort. Politico inexplicably fails to note Newton is exactly the same kind of cretin that his critics are. The only explanation for the criticism is that the critics are jealous Sheldon Adelson hasn't shared his wealth with them.
John King to Newton: DO Piss On My Leg And Tell Me That It's Raining
TRENDING: Gingrich campaign admits error
(CNN) - Newt Gingrich's campaign admitted Wednesday night the former House speaker was inaccurate when he claimed his team offered several witnesses to ABC News to refute statements made by Gingrich's second wife in a controversial interview aired last week.
...
In an interview on Tuesday, King pressed Gingrich on those claims, saying ABC News insisted no such witnesses were put forward.
Gingrich said ABC's defense was "just plain baloney."
"If they're saying that, then they're not being honest," Gingrich said. "We had several people prepared to be very clear and very aggressive in their dispute about that, and (ABC News) wasn't interested."
King was lied to, first at the debate and again days later. There was no error. There was no inaccuracy. Newton deliberately and repeatedly lied to King and then rubbed King's nose in it. And King and his employer choose to endorse those lies by refusing to acknowledge what they were.
Congratulations, John. You have no credibility as a journalist, but there's a bright future for you as the managing editor of PolitiFact.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
The Return of Toerag and Joey Digs
This is scary. Victoria Toerag, wife of diminutive Republican fixer "Joey Digs" DiGenova and Clinton-era cable blowhard, has come to the same conclusion as this blog concerning Newt's lies at the CNN debate:This distorted vision of the world also applies to whether Newt is allowed to ignore the facts. He does so with such conviction that, unless one knows the truth, his delivery mandates believability. Newt takes on a foe with such ferocity that Republicans, hungry for a fighting candidate, have not sought to challenge the veracity of his words. Consider his debate exchange with CNN moderator John King, who opened with a question about Marianne’s revelation.Great minds plagiarize great bloggers. (Note to litigious Republican blowhards: This statement is meant as comedy.)
In claiming as false Marianne’s statement that he asked for an open marriage, Newt asserted,” Every personal friend I have who knew us in that time period said the story was false.”
How could that be? Marianne has said the discussion occurred during a private conversation when they were in counseling. How would any friend know what Newt said only to his then wife?
...
Newt next claimed to CNN that “we offered several of [these friends] to ABC to prove [Marianne’s statement] was false. They weren’t interested because they would like to attack any Republican.” Only it was Newt’s statement that was false. ABC immediately refuted his assertion. ABC Senior News Vice President Jeffrey Schneider stated: “That’s just not true. His daughters were interviewed for our Nightline story last night and we sought interviews with Gingrich or surrogates very aggressively starting Tuesday morning. We would have been happy to interview anyone they put forward.”
In fact, according to ABC, the campaign said it was “going to provide somebody who would answer point by point everything” Marianne said, but “it had not done so as of” the morning of the broadcast. Has any reporter asked the campaign for the names of the people Newt claimed ABC refused to air?
Toensing is right, though, the SCEMESSEM is spineless when it comes to Newt and his lies.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Urine The Monied Class
In Brooklyn, at another church housing OWS protesters, an occupier urinated on a cross, according to Rabbi Chaim Gruber, who has angrily abandoned the OWS movement.Jee Whiz!
In a letter last week to OWS obtained by The Post, the rabbi fumed, “The Park Slope church housing occupiers was desecrated when an occupier peed inside the building and the pee came into contact with a cross.”
The rabbi also cancelled his subscription to HBO after viewing a 2011 episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm on HBOGo.
Actually, it seems the rabbi didn't abandon the Occupy Movement so much as he bored it to death.
Meanwhile, in Manhattan,
When the Rev. Bob Brashear prepared for Sunday services at West Park Presbyterian Church on West 86th Street, he noticed parts of the bronze baptismal font were gone.
In a fire-and-brimstone message to occupiers later that day, he thundered, "It was like pissing on the 99 percent."
That piss seems to be metaphorical.
The artifact vanished just three weeks after a $2,400 Apple MacBook vanished from Brashear's office. He told the occupiers that even when the 100-year-old Upper West Side church extended help to addicts during the 1980s drug scourge, no visitors touched its $12,500 sacramental instrument.
"Not even crackheads messed with that," he said.
An he began to teach them, saying: Blessed are the crackheads, for they know how to aim.
They Should've Put Him In One of Those Gray Bins and Tossed Him Onto The Conveyer Belt
(CNN) – Authorities blocked U.S. Sen. Rand Paul at the Nashville airport Monday after the Kentucky Republican refused a pat-down at a security checkpoint, his spokeswoman said.
Paul went through a scanner at the airport and set off an alarm, said his spokeswoman, Moira Bagley. He wanted to go through the body scan again instead of getting a pat-down, but officers of the Transportation Security Administration refused, Bagley said.
As he was led away in a straightjacket, Rand screeched, "If I had any junk, I would tell you not to touch it."
Sunday, January 22, 2012
But Newtie Isn't One Of Those/I've Known Him All These Years
As a follow-up to the last post, ABC's Brian Ross said on the Howie Kurtz Reliable Putz Hour this morning that the only two character witnesses Newt offered to ABC News were Newton's two daughters from his first marriage.
Because ABC failed to do its journalistic due diligence, we'll never know how Netwon's daughters could affirm that Newton didn't offer to share himself with the evil-stepmom and the evil-stepmistress.
Friday, January 20, 2012
The Burden of Proof
This part of Newton Leroy's happy horseshit from yesterday's debate is particularly interesting:
Let me be quite clear. The story is false. Every personal friend I have who knew us in that period says the story was false. We offered several of them to ABC to prove it was false. They weren't interested, because they would like to attack any Republican. They're attacking the governor, they're attacking me. I'm sure they'll probably get around to Senator Santorum and Congressman Paul. I am tired of the elite media protecting Barack Obama by attacking Republicans.
The story, of course, is that Newton asked his then-wife, Marianne, for permission to fuck Calista while remaining married to Marianne, and Marianne said "no." Newton says that every friend who knew him and Marianne knew the story was false. That is, every friend of Newton's who knew the couple knew that Newton was banging Calista, and also knew that he didn't ask Marianne for permission to bang. Because if a friend didn't know Newton was banging Calista, how could he or she know whether Newton asked Marianne for permission to bang Calista? And how could such friends say the story was false if they didn't even know the predicate fact?
In the interest of complete fairness to Newton, ABC News should disclose the names of the several Newton friends who Newton offered up as character witnesses. Then the media can ask those friends how they know Newton never asked his wife for permission to bang. It's what Newton claims he wants, and he's entitled to no less. Because surely Newton didn't proffer his character witnesses to get ABC to kill the interview. Since those individuals would have no personal knowledge of what Newt asked his wife in private, they couldn't offer any actual "proof" to disprove what Marianne is saying.
(Of course, I don't care about Newton's peabrained urges, nor do I care what his ex-wife thinks of him. I'm more interested in the fact that Newton can blow smoke up people's asses and the SCLM just plays along.)
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Follow-Up Call
Rick, it's God.
Yes, God?
You know when I called and told you to run for President?
Yes, God.
It turns out that wasn't me.
Oh?
No, it was the pain killers.
Oh?
There's this thing called "side effects."
Side what?
When you fill a prescription, do you read the sheet that they give you with the pills?
Read what?
You're still on the painkillers, aren't you?
Yes, God.
Well, then, I'm afraid I can't help you.
No?
Just drop out of the race now.
But....
Trust me.
Uh....
Gotta go, Rick Santorum's on the other line. You'll get a kick out of this one. Just wait.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The Hate Debate
If Ron Paul had wanted to win last night's FOX News debate, he would have just read from his newsletters.
P.S. to Wan Julliams: How's the FOX News gig workin' out for you?
Monday, January 16, 2012
Like A Mighty Stream Running Past A Koch Brothers Refinery
Remember people, the acceptable parameters of debate are:
Martin Luther King, Jnr.: Adulterous Plagiarizing Communist or Christian Conservative Meritocrat?
Please confine your discussion to excerpts from the sixty second clip of the Lincoln Memorial speech, and the traitor's FBI file.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Grand Old Police Blotter: Drink Two For The Kipper
The first G.O.P. arrest of 2012 involves Georgia drug warrior Kip "I Have A Wanker's Nickname" Smith:
Atlanta police Officer Z.A. Kramer, who was following the lawmaker’s 1998 gold four-door Jaguar XJ8, said the traffic light had just turned red when Smith went through the intersection at Pharr Road.
Kramer said he informed Smith, who was traveling alone, why he was stopped, and the lawmaker told him he didn’t realize the light was red.
“I observed the odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from Mr. Smith’s breath,” Kramer said in his report. “He advised me he was a state representative and gave the name ‘Kip Smith.'”
Smith, whose given name is John Andrew Smith, first told the officer he had not consumed any alcoholic beverages.
“I asked him again, and he stated he had consumed a single beer at Hal’s. I noticed also that Mr. Smith’s eyes were watery, and I asked him to exit the vehicle, which he did,” Kramer said in the report.
Smith told the officer he’d had the beer 45 minutes earlier, and the officer asked him to blow into a hand-held “intoximeter”. The officer said the lawmaker refused, stating he would prefer to go to a clinic or the hospital to get tested.
The officer told Smith that was done only after an arrest, and that Smith had not been placed under arrest, but Smith “seemed to be having a difficult time understanding what I was trying to explain to him,” the officer said in the report.
The officer said Smith finally agreed to blow into the device. The report stated that Smith blew a .091., which is above the legal limit of .08.
...
He was given two more breath tests, and Smith blew a .099 and then a .100, “well over the legal limit,” the report said.
The Republican souse is the co-sponsor of a bill requiring that welfare recipients be tested for the use of drugs which don't cause users to blow through intersections while operating deadly machinery.
My only question: Why no obstruction of justice charge?