Hack vs. Hack

Mini-Mick points out a proposition so evident that I didn't bother with it when I read Sully two days ago:

"Daniel Weintraub--blogger of the Bee--makes a good case that Andrew Sullivan has falsely accused Hillary Clinton of being a "waffler" and "prevaricator" when what she's really guilty of is taking a position different from that of Andrew Sullivan. (She's against gay marriage and for civil unions--that might be wrong, but it's a clear position.)"

I don't know how Sully Watch does it, there's just so much crap every day.

P.S. The hacks are Kaus and Sully, not Weintraub, although Weintraub does mangle Sully's words slightly.